United States v. Knox
This text of United States v. Knox (United States v. Knox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6982
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DON EDDLON KNOX, a/k/a D,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00262-RLW-11)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Don Eddlon Knox, Appellant Pro Se. John Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Don Eddlon Knox appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Knox, No. 3:97-cr-
00262-RLW-11 (E.D. Va. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Knox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-knox-ca4-2008.