United States v. Knowles

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Knowles

359 F. App'x 956

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 7, 2010·No. No. 09-12890·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Pinoli, appointed counsel for Oscar Lynden Knowles, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Knowles’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Pinoli, appointed counsel for Oscar Lynden Knowles, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Knowles’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Knowles, 359 F. App'x 956 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

359 F. App'x 956 (United States v. Knowles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related