United States v. Knight

Opinion

Case: 25-30633 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 25-30633

FILED June 8, 2026

Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Brian O. Knight,

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:25-CR-14-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Engelhardt, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Brian O. Knight challenges the substantive reasonableness of the 15-

month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He first argues that the district court gave significant weight to an improper factor, his need for rehabilitation, in violation of Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319, 332-34 (2011). Because he

_____________________

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 25-30633 Document: 56-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2026

No. 25-30633

did not raise this specific argument in the district court, we review it for plain error. See United States v. Zarco-Beiza, 24 F.4th 477, 481-82 (5th Cir. 2022). The court’s statements regarding rehabilitation and Knight’s alcohol abuse, viewed in context, did not clearly or obviously violate Tapia. Thus, Knight has not demonstrated reversible plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

Knight also contends the district court failed to give sufficient weight to his post-incarceration rehabilitation and gave too much weight to his dangerousness based on unrelated charges. The district court thoroughly considered Knight’s history and his arguments for a lesser sentence but concluded that a within-guidelines sentence was appropriate in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Knight fails to show any abuse of discretion. See United States v. Castillo-Rubio, 34 F.4th 404, 411 (5th Cir. 2022).

AFFIRMED.