United States v. Kittredge
This text of 284 F. App'x 588 (United States v. Kittredge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER AND JUDGMENT **
Defendant-Appellant Anthony Robert Kittredge pleaded guilty to robbery affecting commerce, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to the above, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). He was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment on the robbery affecting commerce count, and 84 months on the firearm count, to be served consecutively, and four years’ supervised release thereafter. On direct appeal, we affirmed. United States v. Kittredge, 251 Fed.Appx. 569 (10th Cir.2007) (unpublished). The Supreme Court has now vacated our judgment and remanded to us for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). See Kittredge v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 2426, 171 L.Ed.2d 226 (2008). Upon consideration thereof, we remand to the district court to vacate Mr. Kittredge’s sentence and resentence him in light of Gall.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 F. App'x 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kittredge-ca10-2008.