United States v. King

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8212

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARY KING, a/k/a Kitty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:04-cr-00259-HEH-4)

Submitted: April 29, 2010 Decided: May 3, 2010

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary King, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mary King appeals the district court’s order finding

her ineligible for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). In her informal appellate brief, King

failed to challenge the district court’s reason supporting the

denial of relief. King therefore has forfeited appellate review

of the eligibility issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court

will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED