United States v. Kimball
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In a suit against a collector of internal revenue on his bond for a balance of taxes charged to him under the provisions of sect. 3218, Rev. Stat., he is entitled to a credit for all uncollected taxes transferred by him to his successor in office, if he proves that due diligence was used by him for their collection. *728 The certificate of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue Is a condition precedent to a credit by the First Comptroller of the Treasury before suit, but not to a defence upon the facts if a suit is brought.
The presentation to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue by a collector of a claim for credit in his account, and its rejection by him, is such a presentation of the claim “ to the accounting officers of the treasury for their examination,” and disallowance by them, as will permit the collector, under sect. 951, Rev. Stat., to make proof of his claim in a suit brought against him by the United States to. collect what is due from him on his account.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
101 U.S. 726 (United States v. Kimball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.