United States v. Khayr Basimibnbrown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2024·No. 24-6328·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6328

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KHAYR BASIMIBNBROWN, a/k/a Shitty, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cr-00205-JKB-1)

Submitted: July 30, 2024 Decided: August 2, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Khayr Basimibnbrown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Khayr Basimibnbrown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Khayr Basimibnbrown, (4th Cir. 2024).

United States v. Khayr Basimibnbrown (United States v. Khayr Basimibnbrown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ryan Kibble
992 F.3d 326 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)