United States v. Keys

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2009·No. 08-8547·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8547

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARREN L. KEYS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:98-cr-00144-CCB-1)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darren L. Keys, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darren L. Keys appeals the district court’s marginal

order denying his “Motion for Specific Performance of Plea

Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm. To the extent Keys seeks to

again contest his 2003 criminal conviction, he would first need

to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(a) (2006); 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(h). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keys, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Keys (United States v. Keys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related