United States v. Keys

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Keys

329 F. App'x 384

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2009·No. No. 08-8547·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darren L. Keys appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his “Motion for Specific Performance of Plea Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. To the extent Keys seeks to again contest his 2003 criminal conviction, he would first need to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) (2006); 28 U.S.C.A. §'2255(h). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darren L. Keys appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his “Motion for Specific Performance of Plea Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. To the extent Keys seeks to again contest his 2003 criminal conviction, he would first need to obtain authorization from this court to file a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a) (2006); 28 U.S.C.A. §'2255(h). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Keys, 329 F. App'x 384 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 384 (United States v. Keys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related