United States v. Kenzell R. Evans, United States of America v. Melvin Eugene Jenkins
Opinions
We adhere to our view that one held in custody on an unrelated charge has no right to counsel at the time of his photographic identification as a participant in another crime. United States v. Canty, 430 F.2d 1332 (4th Cir. 1970); United States v. Collins, 416 F.2d 696 (4th Cir. 1969); United States v. Marson, 408 F.2d 644 (4th Cir. 1968). Finding that there were no other facts which would invalidate the identification of Evans and no other error affecting either defendant, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
459 F.2d 481 (United States v. Kenzell R. Evans, United States of America v. Melvin Eugene Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.