United States v. Kenneth Reid

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2026·No. 25-6966·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6966 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6966

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH ROSHAUN REID,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1; 0:25-cv- 13019-CMC)

Submitted: March 12, 2026 Decided: March 17, 2026

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Roshaun Reid, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6966 Doc: 8 Filed: 03/17/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Roshaun Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his

self-styled “motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Writ of Mandamus” as a 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion and dismissing it as successive and unauthorized. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here,

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41

(2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Reid has not made

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Reid’s

motion to consolidate cases, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kenneth Reid, (4th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Kenneth Reid (United States v. Kenneth Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Gonzalez v. Thaler
181 L. Ed. 2d 619 (Supreme Court, 2012)