United States v. Kendall Blue

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 28, 2016
• Docket: 16-6916
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6916

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENDALL LADELL BLUE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (7:11-cr-00135-D-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kendall Ladell Blue, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Jason Cameron, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kendall Ladell Blue appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue

sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment

782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann,

709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s

decision under § 3583(c)(2) for abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-1 (E.D.N.C.

June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED