United States v. Kemmel
295 F.2d 712
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 3, 1961·No. No. 13543·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We have carefully examined the record and have considered the arguments of appellant’s counsel. We can find no substantial prejudicial error in the proceeding. Consequently the judgment of conviction will be affirmed, D.C., 188 F.Supp. 736.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Kemmel, 295 F.2d 712 (3d Cir. 1961).
295 F.2d 712 (United States v. Kemmel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Alcide W. Hernandez
731 F.2d 1147 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. American Airlines, Inc.
570 F. Supp. 654 (N.D. Texas, 1983)