United States v. Kelly

82 U.S. 34, 21 L. Ed. 106, 15 Wall. 34, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1226
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 13, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 82 U.S. 34 (United States v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kelly, 82 U.S. 34, 21 L. Ed. 106, 15 Wall. 34, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1226 (1873).

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

"We do not think that, under the circumstances of the present case, the bounty was forfeited. The able lawyer who fills at present the post of Judge Advocate General, in a case similar to the present, held that “the honorable discharge of the deserter wras a formal final judgment passed by the government upon the entire military record of the soldier, and an authoritative declaration by it that he had left the service in a status of honor; that as such, it dispensed altogether with the supposed necessity that the soldier must obtain bountj- by removal, by order, of the charge of desertion from the rolls, and amoünted of itself to the removal of any charge or impediment in the way of his receiving bounty.” With this opinion we entirely concur.'

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. United States
120 Fed. Cl. 772 (Federal Claims, 2015)
United States v. Caprio
10 M.J. 586 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1980)
Olenick v. Brucker
173 F. Supp. 493 (District of Columbia, 1959)
Bernstein v. Herren
136 F. Supp. 493 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Marshall v. Wyman
132 F. Supp. 169 (N.D. California, 1955)
Griffin v. United States
115 F. Supp. 509 (W.D. Arkansas, 1953)
Commonwealth v. Sipe
73 Pa. D. & C. 181 (Montgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1950)
United States Ex Rel. Hirshberg v. Cooke
336 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Hironimus v. Durant
168 F.2d 288 (Fourth Circuit, 1948)
United States ex rel. Hirshberg v. Malanaphy
168 F.2d 503 (Second Circuit, 1948)
United States ex rel. Hirshberg v. Malanaphy
73 F. Supp. 990 (E.D. New York, 1947)
Durant v. Hironimus
73 F. Supp. 79 (S.D. West Virginia, 1947)
Ex Parte Drainer
65 F. Supp. 410 (N.D. California, 1946)
Fong Chew Chung v. United States
149 F.2d 904 (Ninth Circuit, 1945)
Lamb v. Kroeger
8 N.W.2d 405 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1943)
Parker v. Anderson
25 A.2d 41 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1942)
Zearing v. Johnson
52 P.2d 1019 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Cole v. United States
34 Ct. Cl. 446 (Court of Claims, 1899)
Smith v. Keith & Perry Coal Co.
36 Mo. App. 567 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 U.S. 34, 21 L. Ed. 106, 15 Wall. 34, 1872 U.S. LEXIS 1226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelly-scotus-1873.