United States v. Kelly

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Kelly. Read the opinion of the Court — 510 F.3d 433
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2008·No. 08-7011·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL BENJAMIN KELLY, a/k/a Tiz,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00163-RBS-4)

Submitted: October 21, 2008 Decided: October 28, 2008

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Benjamin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Benjamin Kelly appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) for a

reduction of sentence and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter

or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Kelly, No. 2:94-cr-00163-RBS-

4 (E.D. Va. Filed Apr. 9, entered Apr. 10, 2008; filed May 8,

entered May 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kelly, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Kelly (United States v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related