United States v. Kelley

168 F. App'x 656
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2006
Docket04-41255
StatusUnpublished

This text of 168 F. App'x 656 (United States v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kelley, 168 F. App'x 656 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel Michael Kelley, federal prisoner # 03456-078, appeals from the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction in his sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1), and its corresponding Sentencing Guidelines provision, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4.

Kelley argues that U.S.S.GApp. C, amend. 599 should be applied to reduce his ACCA sentence. However, that provision is inapplicable to § 4B1.4, see United States v. Sanders, 372 F.3d 1183, 11866 (10th Cir.2004), and the denial of Kelley’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Shaw, 30 F.3d 26, 28-29 (5th Cir.1994).

Kelley contends for the first time in a letter pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 28(j), submitted after the Government filed its brief, that U.S.S.G.App. C, amend. 674, which became effective November 1, 2004, should apply to his case and result in reduction of his sentence. We need not consider Kelley’s argument, as it was raised for the first time in a Rule 28(j) letter. See United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos, 412 F.3d 572, 577 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1142, 163 L.Ed.2d 1000 (2006). Kelley has filed a “motion to compel performance pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361.” Kelley’s motion is denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO COMPEL DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos
412 F.3d 572 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Sanders
372 F.3d 1183 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Patricia Ann Shaw
30 F.3d 26 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 F. App'x 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelley-ca5-2006.