United States v. Kelley

624 F. App'x 92
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7184
StatusPublished

This text of 624 F. App'x 92 (United States v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kelley, 624 F. App'x 92 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Lee Kelley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kelley, No. 7:10-cr-00099-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2015); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286 (4th Cir.2013) (finding that Black was not eligible for § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction where he was sentenced to a mandatory minimum because “his sentence was not based on ‘a sentencing range’ that the Sentencing Commission subsequently lowered”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Darnell Black
737 F.3d 280 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 F. App'x 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelley-ca4-2015.