United States v. Kelley
This text of 624 F. App'x 92 (United States v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Samuel Lee Kelley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kelley, No. 7:10-cr-00099-D-1 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2015); see United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 286 (4th Cir.2013) (finding that Black was not eligible for § 3582(c)(2) sentence reduction where he was sentenced to a mandatory minimum because “his sentence was not based on ‘a sentencing range’ that the Sentencing Commission subsequently lowered”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
624 F. App'x 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelley-ca4-2015.