United States v. Keating

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2008·No. 08-6989·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROHAN ST. JOSEPH KEATING, a/k/a Charles Joe,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2)

Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 17, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan St. Joseph Keating, Appellant Pro Se. Carol M. Marx, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Keating, No.

2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keating, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Keating (United States v. Keating) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related