United States v. Kay

655 F. App'x 165
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2016·No. No. 16-6338·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Leon Kay appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kay, No. 6:09-cr-00252-1, 2016 WL 661591 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 18, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kay, 655 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2016).

655 F. App'x 165 (United States v. Kay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ramirez
846 F.3d 615 (Second Circuit, 2017)