United States v. Karl A. Schledwitz

86 F.3d 73, 1996 WL 332746
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 27, 1996·No. 95-5309, 95-5409·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having [74]*74been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

MERRITT, C.J., filed a separate dissent in which MARTIN, J., joined.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Karl A. Schledwitz, 86 F.3d 73, 1996 WL 332746 (6th Cir. 1996).

86 F.3d 73 (United States v. Karl A. Schledwitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Karl A. Schledwitz v. United States
169 F.3d 1003 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Frost
125 F.3d 346 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Karl A. Schledwitz
86 F.3d 73 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)