United States v. Kalule
This text of 59 F. App'x 950 (United States v. Kalule) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Yunus Kalule appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2. Kalule contends that the district court erred by failing to grant his request for a downward departure based on the atypical nature of his case. We lack jurisdiction because Kalule knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000). This appeal is
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F. App'x 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kalule-ca9-2003.