United States v. Jupiter
This text of 623 F. App'x 117 (United States v. Jupiter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Clarence Sheldon Jupiter appeals the district court’s order granting his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) for a sentence reduction.
AFFIRMED.
The district court granted Jupiter’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, but did not reduce Jupiter’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 F. App'x 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jupiter-ca4-2015.