United States v. Joshua Cogdell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2025
Docket25-6664
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Joshua Cogdell (United States v. Joshua Cogdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joshua Cogdell, (4th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 25-6664 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6664

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA MICHAEL COGDELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-01521-JFA-2)

Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 4, 2025

Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Michael Cogdell, Appellant Pro Se. Elliott Bishop Daniels, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 25-6664 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/04/2025 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Michael Cogdell appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We conclude that the

district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that, even if Cogdell presented

extraordinary and compelling circumstances, the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors counseled

against his early release. See United States v. Johnson, 143 F.4th 212, 215 (4th Cir. 2025)

(stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v.

Cogdell, No. 3:07-cr-01521-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 2025). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Shaheem Johnson
143 F.4th 212 (Fourth Circuit, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Joshua Cogdell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joshua-cogdell-ca4-2025.