United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas

52 F.3d 827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 F.3d 454
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 26, 1995·No. 93-50507·Published

Opinion

52 F.3d 827

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Teofilo SOLORIO, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bourne Bobby THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 93-50507, 93-50508.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 26, 1995.

Before: NELSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING*, District Judge.

ORDER

The court's previous opinion, slip op. 11375 [37 F.3d 454] (9th Cir. Sept. 20, 1994) is hereby withdrawn. An unpublished disposition is being filed.

*

The Honorable Samuel P. King, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas, 52 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 1995).

52 F.3d 827 (United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related