United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas
This text of 43 F.3d 1334 (United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Teofilo SOLORIO, Defendant-Appellant,
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Bourne Bobby THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 93-50507, 93-50508.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 17, 1995.
Before: D.W. NELSON, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and KING*, District Judge.ORDER
The motion of Plaintiff-Appellee, filed December 12, 1994, requesting a delay in the publication of the opinion in this case is granted. Publication of the opinion is hereby withheld until further order of this Court.
The motion for an order remanding this case for the limited purpose of determining whether there was prosecutorial misconduct is hereby denied.
The Honorable Samuel P. King, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 F.3d 1334, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 384, 95 Daily Journal DAR 672, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-teofilo-solorio-united-states-of-america-v-bourne-ca9-1995.