United States v. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez

441 F.3d 1061, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7788, 2006 WL 802537
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 30, 2006·No. 03-30355, 03-30371, 03-30356·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Judges Reavley and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing; Judge Tallman has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en bane and Judge Reavley so recommends. Judge W. Fletcher has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez, 441 F.3d 1061, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7788, 2006 WL 802537 (9th Cir. 2006).

441 F.3d 1061 (United States v. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Juarez-Torres
441 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (D. New Mexico, 2006)
United States v. Sergio Manzo-Jurado
452 F.3d 1028 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Manzp-Jurado
457 F.3d 928 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Jose Luis Ortiz-Hernandez
441 F.3d 1061 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)