United States v. Jose Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jose Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 627 F. App'x 381
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 24, 2018·No. 18-40144·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-40144 Document: 00514654432 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/24/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 18-40144 FILED Conference Calendar September 24, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:17-CR-1366-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luis Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 18-40144 Document: 00514654432 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/24/2018

No. 18-40144

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Gonzalez, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Jose Gonzalez (United States v. Jose Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)