United States v. Jose Gonzalez

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Jose Gonzalez

634 F. App'x 981

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2016·No. 15-40867·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Alberto Gonzalez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, *982 and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Alberto Gonzalez raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. The motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, *982 and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir, R. 47,5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Jose Gonzalez, 634 F. App'x 981 (5th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

634 F. App'x 981 (United States v. Jose Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related