United States v. Jordan

319 F. App'x 307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jordan. Read the opinion of the Court — 509 F.3d 191
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2009·No. 08-8491·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Micah Daniel Jordan appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jordan, No. 2:99-cr-00019-JBF-1 (E.D. Va. dated Oct. 21, 2008; entered Oct. 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jordan, 319 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2009).

319 F. App'x 307 (United States v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related