United States v. Jordan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 1998·No. 98-6162·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6162

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MONTA OLANDER JORDAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-103, CA-96-125)

Submitted: September 29, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monta Olander Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Monta O. Jordan appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Jordan, Nos. CR-94-103; CA-96-125 (W.D. Va.

Dec. 2, 1997; Jan. 6, 1998). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. 320

(1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jordan, (4th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Jordan (United States v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lindh v. Murphy
521 U.S. 320 (Supreme Court, 1997)