United States v. Jordan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus ROBERT LOUIS JORDAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-94-163, CA-94-2612-3-19BC)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Louis Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magis- trate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jordan, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-94- 2612-3-19BC (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED