United States v. Jones

251 F. App'x 896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 421 F.3d 359
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2007·No. 07-50065·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Robert L. Jones appeals the sentence imposed following revocation of his term of supervised release. Jones argues that his 36-month imprisonment sentence is unreasonable because it is above the advisory guidelines range and the sentencing factors cited by the district court can be satisfied with a shorter sentence.

The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Jones’ sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir.2001). The sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 251 F. App'x 896 (5th Cir. 2007).

251 F. App'x 896 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States of America v. Modesto Gonzalez
250 F.3d 923 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Pepper Sue Hinson
429 F.3d 114 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)