United States v. Jones
This text of 668 F. App'x 63 (United States v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding. precedent in this circuit.
Randy Wesley Jones appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motions for sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v, Jones, No. 5:12-cr-00004-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 F. App'x 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jones-ca4-2016.