United States v. Jones

35 F. App'x 379
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2002·No. 02-6352·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bandele M. Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief in his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-95-51; CA-02-1 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 6, 2002). Additionally, we deny Jones’ motions to proceed in forma pauperis, to amend the record, and for oral argument, which we dispense with because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 35 F. App'x 379 (4th Cir. 2002).

35 F. App'x 379 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related