United States v. Jones

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 28, 2000
• Docket: 99-7426
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7426

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN T. JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Shelby. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-94-5, CA-96-147-4-V)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen T. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Stephen T. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999)

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-94-5; CA-96-147-4-V (W.D.N.C. July

19 & Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED