United States v. Jones

30 F. App'x 96
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2002·No. 01-7844·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-97-943; CA-01-829-2-23 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 20, 2001 & entered Aug. 21, 2001; filed Sept. 5, 2001 & entered Sept. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *97 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 30 F. App'x 96 (4th Cir. 2002).

30 F. App'x 96 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related