United States v. Johnston

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnston. Read the opinion of the Court — 424 F. App'x 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2009·No. 09-7010·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM JOHNSTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00135-GCM-1)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Johnston, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Johnston appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.

Johnston, No. 3:00-cr-00135-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). See

United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnston, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Johnston (United States v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Hood
556 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)