United States v. Johnson
This text of 464 F. App'x 577 (United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Anthony Leon Johnson appeals from the denial of his motion to reconsider his 240-month sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Johnson contends that the district court improperly denied his motion to reconsider his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) by failing to consider a sentence outside of the career offender guidelines. The district court did not have jurisdiction to resentence Johnson based on his § 3582(c) motion because Johnson was sentenced pursuant to Guideline § 4B 1.1. See United States v. Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 730-32 (9th Cir.2009).
Johnson also contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable. In Johnson’s previous appeal, this court already determined that his 240-month sentence was reasonable.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
464 F. App'x 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnson-ca9-2011.