United States v. Johnson

364 F. App'x 243
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 534 F.3d 690
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 26, 2010·No. No. 09-2323·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Kenneth Johnson received a two-level sentence reduction under Amendments 706 and 711 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which the Sentencing Commission has declared to be retroactive. Johnson would like a reduction greater than the two levels permitted under the amended guidelines, but his position is foreclosed by United States v. Cunningham, 554 F.3d 703 (7th Cir.2009), where we held that district courts lack the authority to impose sentences below the minimum amended guidelines range when ruling on sentencing reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in United States v. Dillon, 572 F.3d 146 (3d Cir.2009), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 130 S.Ct. 797, — L.Ed.2d —(2009), which will address the issue Johnson raises. We therefore hold Johnson’s appeal until the decision in Dillon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 364 F. App'x 243 (7th Cir. 2010).

364 F. App'x 243 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cunningham
554 F.3d 703 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Dillon
572 F.3d 146 (Third Circuit, 2009)