United States v. Johnson

Seventh Circuit

United States v. Johnson

183 F. App'x 584

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 534 F.3d 690 →

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 7, 2006·No. No. 04-2406·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On Paladino remand, the district judge stated that he would have imposed the same guidelines sentence that he imposed originally had he known that the guidelines were merely advisory and not mandatory. Such a resentence is presumptively reasonable and in this case the presumption has not been rebutted, the judge having fully considered the defendant’s arguments for a lower standard in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On Paladino remand, the district judge stated that he would have imposed the same guidelines sentence that he imposed originally had he known that the guidelines were merely advisory and not mandatory. Such a resentence is presumptively reasonable and in this case the presumption has not been rebutted, the judge having fully considered the defendant’s arguments for a lower standard in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Johnson, 183 F. App'x 584 (7th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

183 F. App'x 584 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related