United States v. Johnson
132 F. App'x 661
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided May 19, 2005·No. No. 04-1425·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Order
The United States has confessed error in this appeal, in light of United States v. Booker, —- U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Moreover, the United States concedes that (a) the issue was preserved in the district court, and (b) the error is not harmless. Accordingly, the sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing consistent with the remedial procedure laid out in Booker.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Johnson, 132 F. App'x 661 (7th Cir. 2005).
132 F. App'x 661 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doe v. City of Chi.
335 F. Supp. 3d 1098 (E.D. Illinois, 2018)
Doe 1 v. City of Chicago
N.D. Illinois, 2018
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. International Profit Associates, Inc.
654 F. Supp. 2d 767 (N.D. Illinois, 2009)