United States v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7763

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STACY TREMAINE JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00114-F-1)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacy Tremaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May- Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Stacy Tremaine Johnson appeals the district court’s

order granting relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Johnson, No. 7:00-cr-

00114-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED