United States v. Johnson

390 F. App'x 280
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 510 F.3d 521
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2010·No. No. 10-6271·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Dillon v. United States, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010); United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 250-52 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 390 F. App'x 280 (4th Cir. 2010).

390 F. App'x 280 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dillon v. United States
560 U.S. 817 (Supreme Court, 2010)
United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)