United States v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6271

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRUCE LEE JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH-2)

Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 11, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lee Johnson appeals the district court’s order

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Dillon v.

United States, 2010 WL 2400109 (U.S. June 17, 2010) (No.

09-6338); United States v. Dunphy, 531 F.3d 247, 250-52 (4th

Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:02-cr-

00579-CWH-2 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED