United States v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 F. App'x 85
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 26, 2009·No. 08-8334·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8334

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERNEST EDWARD JOHNSON, a/k/a Ernest Edward Cromwell,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:99-cr-00034-CCB-1)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherri Lee Keene, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greenbelt, Maryland; Nicholas J. Vitek, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Andrea L. Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ernest Edward Johnson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.

3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 1:99-cr-

00034-CCB-1 (D. Md. Oct. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.