United States v. Johnson

300 F. App'x 221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 F. App'x 85
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2008·No. 08-7114·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Blake Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. 3:94-cr-00061-gmw-5 (W.D.Va. June 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 300 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2008).

300 F. App'x 221 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related