United States v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6414

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-3331-A)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Wasserman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrew Levchuk, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

The district court entered an order denying Johnson’s 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion on November 24, 1993. On

January 14, 1999, Johnson moved for a “reinstatement of right to

appeal.” The district court denied the motion, and Johnson timely

appealed. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Johnson,

No. CR-90-3331-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED