United States v. Johnson
This text of United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6980
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KEITH BERNARD JOHNSON, a/k/a Bonji Denard Crane, a/k/a Bonji DeNard Crane,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-29-P, CR-93-268-P)
Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Bernard Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion for appointment of a new supervising probation officer. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-93-29-P; CR-93- 268-P (W.D.N.C. May 31, 1996). We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnson-ca4-1997.