United States v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 3, 1997·No. 96-6980·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6980

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEITH BERNARD JOHNSON, a/k/a Bonji Denard Crane, a/k/a Bonji DeNard Crane,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-29-P, CR-93-268-P)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 3, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Bernard Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for appointment of a new supervising probation officer. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-93-29-P; CR-93- 268-P (W.D.N.C. May 31, 1996). We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.