United States v. Johnley
This text of 88 F. App'x 993 (United States v. Johnley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of another act of child molestation at Johnley’s trial. United States v. Danielson, 325 F.3d 1054, 1075-76 (9th Cir.2003); see also United States v. LeMay, 260 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir.2001). To the contrary, the district court conscientiously applied the LeMay factors in appraising its earlier evidentiary determination, and quite reasonably concluded that they weighed in favor of admission. Because there was no error in the admission of this evidence, the judgment of the district court is hereby
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 F. App'x 993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnley-ca9-2004.