United States v. Joel Ponce-Ramirez

421 F. App'x 713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 2011
Docket10-10058
StatusUnpublished

This text of 421 F. App'x 713 (United States v. Joel Ponce-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Joel Ponce-Ramirez, 421 F. App'x 713 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Joel Priciciliano Ponce-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 21-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ponce-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for re *714 lief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
421 F. App'x 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-joel-ponce-ramirez-ca9-2011.